enterprise risk

most institutional failures are not isolated errors. they are regime transitions: slow structural drifts in which formally coherent systems begin producing persistent harm while remaining internally justified.

my work focuses on analysing whether complex organisations remain structurally coherent over time, and on identifying early indicators that governance, controls, or decision architectures are entering unstable or self-distorting regimes.

what i work on

• structural coherence and integrity diagnostics
• contradiction accumulation and regime drift analysis
• governance and control architecture stress-testing
• collapse and institutional inversion detection
• harm propagation and systemic failure mapping
• early-warning indicators for silent regime change

where this fits

this work aligns naturally with second-line and oversight functions, including:

• enterprise risk management
• model governance and assurance
• internal audit and systems assurance
• regulatory science and policy analysis
• stress testing and scenario design
• transformation and control redesign programmes

what value looks like

• detection of silent institutional drift
• early warning of brittle or inverted controls
• identification of hidden structural dependencies
• prevention of chronic harm-producing regimes
• strengthening of governance architectures

what this is not

• not compliance box-checking
• not whistleblowing or investigative work
• not cultural or moral critique
• not a substitute for legal or regulatory judgement

integrodynamics provides a formal framework for analysing institutional regime behaviour. my professional interest is applying that framework inside real organisations, where early detection of structural failure is often the only point at which meaningful correction remains possible. i am open to permanent or project-based roles where this kind of second-order risk and regime analysis is useful.